Photo, text and collage credits, MHLivingNews.

Federal Data Spotlights Manufactured Home Industry Quality, Regulatory Questions

A statement by HUD’s manufactured housing program administrator, Pam Danner, JD, to the Wisconsin Housing Alliance (WHA) became a hot topic of conversation during and after a recent gathering of industry professionals in San Antonio, Texas.

Danner reportedly told the WHA that nationwide, there were fewer than 30 manufactured home buyers that went to dispute resolution.

Another Washington, D.C. metro source that investigated told ManufacturedHomeLivingNews that there were only 13 claims that went to dispute resolution for the year.

bill-matchneer-retired-manufactured-housing-program-administrator-posted-mhlivingnews-inside-mh-Bill Matchneer, J.D. – a previous administrator for the HUD Code manufactured home program, told MHLivingNews that a miniscule number of consumer complaints going to dispute resolution has been the pattern for several years. Matchneer was interviewed by Inside MH, to see that video interview, click here.

Key Facts

Are quality and satisfaction a matter of sheer luck, or is it due to manufactured home program and production design?

It’s important to note several key facts.

First, out of some 81,100 new manufactured homes sold in 2016, to have only 13 complaints go to dispute resolution means that only 0.00016029593 – less than 1/1000th of one percent – couldn’t be resolved by normal seller/builder/installer service.

That’s the mirror image of a study MHLivingNews reported which revealed manufactured home buyers are overwhelmingly satisfied with their purchase (click the image, linked below).

PRC and Southeastern Research logos are the property of the respective company, and are provided here under fair use guidelines. Photo, text and collage credits, Manufactured Home Living News.

Those facts being true, why did Danner and HUD spend federal tax dollars essentially advertising for people to lodge complaints against manufactured housing builders, sellers, and installers?

That’s Washington,” a D.C. based official said. “They can’t believe that the quality and satisfaction with the homes produced by the industry are that good. They thought if they advertised for complaints, they’d get many more. They were in shock at HUD at the minuscule numbers of dispute resolution complaints.”

Inspectors and Inspections Yield Satisfaction 

These facts mean that in 2016, manufactured home buyers had a 99.9998397041 percent chance – nearly 100 percent – of having service or other quality issues satisfactorily resolved.  That’s an amazing outcome for homes that the U.S. Census Bureau research states are about half the cost of traditional, on-site construction.

For those who know that a modern manufactured home is highly inspected, it should come as no surprise. 3 bullet points explain why.

  • Factory builders inspect their own homes.  They want happy buyers and whenever possible, want to reduce field service costs.
  • Then, federally-deployed third-party inspectors also do in-plant inspections for compliance with federal construction, energy, and safety standards.
  • Then, there’s inspections done by the seller when a home is installed, plus the routine state or local inspections.

What those bullet points demonstrate is that manufactured homes are routinely more inspected than traditional, on-site construction.

Independent Manufacturers Association calls HUD Out

For “A Cup of Coffee With…” MHARR president and CEO M. Mark Weiss, click here or on the photo. Credit: MHProNews.

At a time when those manufacturers are producing their best homes ever – as demonstrated by minimal dispute resolution program referrals — the program continues to lavish funding on entrenched contractors for make-work activity that needlessly increases home prices while providing few or no benefits for consumers,” M. Mark Weiss, President and CEO of the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulator Reform, told MHLivingNews.

MHARR, therefore – and particularly with a new Administration in office that has pledged to roll-back wasteful, unnecessary and destructive regulation – has begun to evaluate and advance tighter controls on such [unnecessary] expenditures,” Weiss said, “including, but not limited to, possible cutbacks in funds appropriated for the program.”

Dr. Ben Carson to the Rescue?

Will incoming HUD Secretary, Dr. Ben Carson, clean house at HUD’s manufactured home program, and “enforce the law” on issues such as enhanced preemption mandated by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000?

Dr. Carson touted his support for manufactured homes in written comments during his confirmation hearings. The Trump Administration has repeatedly said that it would “enforce the laws” already on the books during and since his successful election campaign.

In the midst of the widely-publicized affordable housing crisis in the U.S., such facts ought to cause media, public officials and quality affordable home seekers to take note and act appropriately. ##

SoheylaKovachManufacturedHomeLivingNewsManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews-Submitted by Soheyla Kovach to

Check Also


‘Inexcusable and Major Problem’ Exclusive MHLivingNews Question and Answer (Q&A) with Mark Weiss, J.D., President, and CEO of Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR)

In the legal world, the difference between one word and another can be significant. The …