manufacturedhomelivingnews.com Manufactured Home Living News
“This article synthesizes the key points from the provided sources, verifies claims where possible, and highlights the advocacy gaps between MHARR and MHI. It incorporates external references to corroborate data and notes the absence of contradictory evidence on key claims, while acknowledging the complexity of regulatory processes. The content is structured to inform readers about the manufactured housing industry’s challenges and the critical role of advocacy in addressing the affordable housing crisis.” So said xAI’s Grok based on an inquiry made by MHLivingNews that is found at this link here.
What Grok has done in the intro above and in what is provided in Part I below is digest information that provides examples of hybrid journalism.
Hybrid journalism blends human expertise on a specific subject with artificial intelligence’s (AI) ability to digest a lot of information in a rapid fashion and then ‘logically’ check it against other evidence for accuracy. More insights and other topics follow in Part II. Hotlinks in Part I in the body of the article are edited in by this writer for MHLivingNews and for a similar “Reality Check” series installment for the mainstream Patch.
Part I
MHARR vs. MHI: Advocacy Gaps and Regulatory Capture in Manufactured Housing
The manufactured housing industry, often referred to as “MHVille,” is a critical component of addressing America’s affordable housing crisis. HUD Code manufactured homes are recognized as the most affordable form of permanent single-family housing in the U.S., yet the industry has faced persistent underperformance in the 21st century.
Two key trade organizations, the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) and the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), represent different segments of the industry, but their approaches to advocacy and transparency differ significantly, raising questions about their effectiveness and priorities.
Recent reports from Manufactured Home Pro News (MHProNews) highlight these disparities, focusing on pending legislation and the appointment of Teresa Payne as MHI’s Vice President of Policy, which may signal regulatory capture.
This article examines these issues, verifies claims with external sources, and explores the broader implications for the manufactured housing industry.
MHARR’s Concerns Over Pending Legislation
On April 14, 2025, MHARR released a Washington Update detailing concerns about H.R. 8373, the “Manufactured Housing Affordability and Energy Efficiency Act of 2024,” supported by MHI.
MHARR argues that this bill, while ostensibly aimed at improving affordability and energy efficiency, contains provisions that could harm the industry.
Specifically, MHARR criticizes the bill’s alignment with Department of Energy (DOE) energy standards, which they claim would increase costs for manufactured homes, making them less affordable for low- and moderate-income buyers. MHARR’s President and CEO, Mark Weiss, J.D., asserts that these standards are based on a flawed process and could price millions out of homeownership.
MHARR’s position is grounded in their long-standing opposition to the DOE’s energy rule, which they argue MHI has covertly supported for years. According to MHARR, MHI’s backing of H.R. 8373 contradicts its public stance on affordability, as the bill would codify energy standards that raise production costs without clear consumer benefits. MHARR cites their own efforts to block these standards, including a letter to the DOE referenced in the agency’s decision to pause the rule. This aligns with a 2022 MHProNews report, which noted that MHARR’s advocacy and supporting documents from MHProNews influenced the DOE’s reconsideration of the energy rule.
External verification of MHARR’s claims is limited due to the niche nature of the topic, but a 2022 GovTrack analysis supports MHARR’s skepticism, giving a similar MHI-backed bill (H.R. 7651) a near-zero chance of passage due to legislative hurdles. This suggests that MHI’s advocacy may prioritize optics over substance, as MHARR alleges. No contradictory evidence was found to refute MHARR’s claim that the DOE standards would increase costs, but the lack of mainstream media coverage on this issue makes it difficult to fully corroborate.
MHI’s Advocacy: Posturing or Progress?
MHI, which claims to represent all segments of the manufactured housing industry, including producers, retailers, communities, and lenders, has been criticized by MHARR and MHProNews for its lack of transparency and effectiveness. The MHProNews article cites MHI’s website, which promotes “Elevating Housing Innovation; Expanding Attainable Homeownership,” yet fails to mention key legislative priorities like the enforcement of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (MHIA) and its “enhanced preemption” provision. This provision, designed to override local zoning barriers that restrict manufactured home placements, is a cornerstone of MHARR’s advocacy but is conspicuously absent from MHI’s public messaging.
MHARR argues that MHI’s silence on enhanced preemption and its support for bills like H.R. 8373 suggest a strategy of “paltering” — presenting partial truths to create a misleading impression of advocacy. For example, MHI’s former chairman, William Boor, testified before Congress in 2024 that MHI supports enhanced preemption, yet MHProNews notes that this stance is not reflected on MHI’s website. This discrepancy raises questions about MHI’s priorities, with MHARR alleging that MHI’s actions facilitate industry consolidation by larger members at the expense of smaller, independent producers.
To verify these claims, I examined MHI’s website (https://www.manufacturedhousing.org), which indeed lacks references to enhanced preemption in its public-facing content as of May 2025. A 2024 EIN Presswire report corroborates MHARR’s critique, noting that MHI’s advocacy often aligns with the interests of its larger members, such as Clayton Homes and Cavco Industries, which benefit from industry consolidation. No direct evidence contradicts MHARR’s claim of MHI’s inaction on enhanced preemption, though MHI’s broader membership base may necessitate a more consensus-driven approach, potentially diluting its focus on specific issues.
Teresa Payne and Regulatory Capture
The second MHProNews article focuses on MHI’s appointment of Teresa Payne as Vice President of Policy, a move revealed through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by MHARR. Payne, a former HUD official who served as Acting Administrator of the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs (OMHP), joined MHI in a role that raises concerns about regulatory capture — the phenomenon where industry influences regulators to prioritize corporate interests over public good. MHARR argues that Payne’s transition from HUD to MHI, an organization representing major industry players, could undermine HUD’s impartiality in regulating manufactured housing.
MHARR’s FOIA request uncovered that Payne’s departure from HUD coincided with her appointment at MHI, suggesting a “revolving door” between government and industry. This is particularly concerning given Payne’s role in overseeing HUD’s manufactured housing programs, which include enforcing the MHIA and addressing zoning barriers. MHARR contends that Payne’s move to MHI could signal a continuation of HUD’s failure to fully implement enhanced preemption, a point echoed in a 2024 Patch article that highlights HUD’s inconsistent enforcement of existing laws.
External sources provide some context for these claims. A 2023 Niskanen Center report to the U.S. House Financial Services Committee emphasized manufactured housing’s potential to address affordability but noted regulatory barriers, including zoning restrictions, that HUD has not adequately addressed. While no direct evidence confirms Payne’s involvement in blocking enhanced preemption, her transition to MHI aligns with MHARR’s narrative of regulatory capture. No contradictory evidence was found to refute MHARR’s concerns, though the complexity of HUD’s regulatory processes makes it challenging to attribute delays solely to Payne.
Industry Underperformance and Consolidation
Both MHARR and MHProNews argue that the manufactured housing industry’s underperformance — producing only 89,169 homes in 2023 compared to 945,000 single-family housing starts, per a 2024 National Association of Home Builders report — is linked to MHI’s failure to advocate effectively for independent producers and consumers. MHARR points to the MHIA’s enhanced preemption as a solution to zoning barriers, which could unlock significant market growth. In contrast, MHI’s focus on initiatives like the CrossMod® homes, which MHProNews calls a “Trojan Horse” due to their higher costs and limited production data, appears to prioritize niche markets over broad affordability.
A 2024 EIN Presswire article supports this view, noting that MHI’s leading members, including Clayton Homes and Cavco Industries, have not disclosed production totals for CrossMod® homes, suggesting limited success. MHARR and the Modular Home Builders Association have criticized this initiative, arguing that it diverts resources from mainstream HUD Code homes. Antitrust allegations against MHI members, reported in a 2024 MHProNews article, further suggest that consolidation by larger firms may be stifling competition, a claim supported by legal researcher Samuel Strommen’s thesis on industry monopolization.
No contradictory evidence refutes the claim of industry underperformance, as HUD data confirms a 21% production decline from 2022 to 2023. However, MHI’s broader membership may face challenges in aligning diverse interests, potentially explaining its less aggressive stance compared to MHARR, which focuses solely on independent manufacturers.
Advocacy Gaps and the Path Forward
The contrast between MHARR and MHI is stark. MHARR’s transparent, aggressive advocacy for regulatory reform and enhanced preemption aligns with the interests of independent producers and consumers seeking affordable housing. MHI’s broader representation, while inclusive, appears to dilute its focus, with critics alleging it prioritizes the consolidation interests of larger members. The appointment of Teresa Payne and the support for H.R. 8373 underscore these concerns, suggesting a need for greater scrutiny of MHI’s actions.
To address these issues, MHARR proposes a new post-production trade group to represent retailers, communities, and other non-manufacturing segments, a suggestion supported by a 2023 MHProNews report. Such a group could complement MHARR’s efforts and provide a counterbalance to MHI’s influence. Consumers, investors, and policymakers should demand transparency from MHI and push for the enforcement of existing laws like the MHIA to unlock manufactured housing’s potential.
Conclusion
The manufactured housing industry stands at a crossroads. With HUD Code homes offering unmatched affordability, the failure to address regulatory and zoning barriers is a missed opportunity. MHARR’s focused advocacy contrasts with MHI’s broader but less transparent approach, raising questions about regulatory capture and industry consolidation. As HUD Secretary Scott Turner emphasizes affordable housing, the industry must align with this vision through robust, transparent advocacy. The evidence suggests MHARR is leading this charge, while MHI’s actions warrant closer examination.
For more details, see MHARR’s Washington Update (https://manufacturedhousingassociationregulatoryreform.org/manufactured-housing-association-for-regulatory-reform-mharr-april-14-2025-washington-update-an-exclusive-report-and-analysis/) and MHProNews’s analyses (https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/mharr-addresses-growing-concerns-regarding-pending-legislation-supported-by-ykw-copilot-on-gemini-and-xais-grok-gaps-in-advocacy-between-mharr-mhi-exclusive-mhville-facts-evidence-analysis/, https://www.manufacturedhomepronews.com/manufactured-housing-association-for-regulatory-reform-mharr-reveal-hud-foia-re-teresa-payne-new-manufactured-housing-institute-vice-president-of-policy-regulatory-capture-why-it-matters-fea/).
Part II
1) As of the date and time shown, the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) had not shown ANY ‘news’ stories for the month of May. This is despite the fact that MHI claims to offering a “full perspective” of the “latest news,” a clearly misleading and apparently deceptive claim. Is MHI seriously claiming to offer a “full perspective” on the “latest news” when they had NO news posted publicly since April 7, 2025? It is absurd on its face.
2) Was that AI generated remarks a one-off? Hardly. Our MHProNews sister site has been using a blend of AI fact-checks and human expertise of over 2 years. During that span, Copilot, Gemini, xAI’s Grok and other AI systems have been tested. The three named have been used the most. Recent examples of what Gemini and Copilot said about the differences between the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) and its notion of advocacy vs. that of MHARR are shown below. The words generated were by Copilot, the arrows and other annotions were added by MHProNews to spotlight specific points.
3) There is always more to be said, but that is plenty to make the points about hybrid journalism and why the manufactured home industry is underperforming during an affordable housing crisis. In short, while there are many factors involved, among them is that several MHI members apparently want the status quo. Some have said as much in their investor relations remarks that point to their desire to consolidate the industry into their own hands.
For greater insights, surf this site and/or check out the deeper dive article involving Gemini found at this link here. The video below is also part of that more in depth linked report.
Stay tuned for more. Thanks for checking in.
Mobile Home and Manufactured Home Living News explores the good, bad, and ugly realities that keep the most proven form of affordable home ownership under-appreciated and misunderstood. MHLivingNews provides third-party research and other resource collections and reports not found on other sites. We also provide thought provoking analysis that are designed to open minds and hearts. This is the widely acknowledged best source for authentic news on mobile and manufactured home living, as well as the policies that impact this segment of housing that provides 22 million Americans with good, surprisingly appealing living.
On our MHProNews sister-site and here on MHLivingNews, we lay out the facts and insights that others can’t or won’t do. That’s what makes our sister site and this location the runaway leaders for authentic information about affordable housing in general, the politics behind the problems, and manufactured homes specifically.
That’s a wrap on this installment of “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) (See Related Reports, further below. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHLivingNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing. For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com. This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position, and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach
Recent and Related Reports:
The text/image boxes below are linked to other reports, which can be accessed by clicking on them.
